Friday, September 18, 2026

Gas Prices

A Facebook friend stole this from someone and reposted it, so I stole it from him.

================================

I keep hearing people complain that gasoline is over $4.00 a gallon. And yes, I'd love to see it at $2.00 again. But before we declare gasoline the most outrageously expensive liquid on Earth, let's put things in perspective.

For $4.00, I get a GALLON of gasoline. I pour it into a 4,000-pound machine, turn a key, and that gallon will haul me, my wife, the groceries, the golf clubs and half the junk in my trunk almost 30 miles down the highway.

That's actually a pretty impressive day's work for $4.00.

Now let's compare.

A restaurant sells me a 5-ounce glass of wine for $9. That's about $230 a gallon. And how far does it transport me? 
Usually from the dinner table to the men's room.

A fancy coffee shop can charge $6 for a 16-ounce latte. That's $48 a gallon. It doesn't transport me 30 miles. It transports me from "Leave me alone" to "Okay, now you may speak."

Bottled water at a convenience store might be $2.50 for 20 ounces. That's $16 a gallon, for something that occasionally falls out of the sky FOR FREE.

A 12-ounce energy drink at $3.50 works out to more than $37 a gallon. Apparently caffeine becomes a precious mineral once you put lightning bolts on the can.

Buy one of those little 2-ounce bottles of "energy shot" for $3. That's $192 a gallon. At that price, it shouldn't give me energy. It should mow my lawn.

Maple syrup at $8 for a 12-ounce bottle? About $85 a gallon. And its principal technological achievement is making pancakes sticky.

Vanilla extract at $6 for two ounces? That's $384 a gallon. For $384, I expect the vanilla bean to come to my house and bake the cookies.

Printer ink can cost thousands of dollars per gallon. And unlike gasoline, it sometimes refuses to come out because the printer has decided cyan is low.

Even that $9 glass of wine deserves another look. At roughly $230 a gallon, filling a typical 15-gallon gas tank with restaurant wine would cost about $3,450.

Of course, after drinking 15 gallons of wine, transportation would no longer be your biggest concern.

So yes, $4.00 gasoline is expensive.

But it's also a remarkable bargain when you think about what you're buying. You're purchasing enough concentrated energy to push several thousand pounds of steel, glass, groceries and humanity nearly 30 miles.

Meanwhile, we'll cheerfully pay $6 for coffee, $9 for wine and $3 for water, then stand at the gas pump staring at the numbers like we're watching the national debt clock.

Maybe gasoline doesn't need better pricing.

Maybe it just needs a fancier name. "Handcrafted Premium Petroleum, locally pumped, small-batch refined, with subtle notes of octane and dinosaur." Put it in a 12-ounce artisan bottle and charge $14.

We'll line up around the block.

==============================

To me, this is common sense. You get what you want and have to pay the market price for the products. Restrict the supply, you get higher prices. Increase demand, you get higher prices.

Wednesday, August 05, 2026

New Words...

 My friend Bill finds the best funnies ...

1. Cashtration (n.): The act of buying a house, which renders the subject financially impotent for an indefinite period of time.
2. Ignoranus: A person who's both stupid and an asshole.
3. Intaxicaton: Euphoria at getting a tax refund, which lasts until you realize it was your money to start with.
4. Reintarnation: Coming back to life as a hillbilly.
5. Bozone ( n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating the bozone layer, unfortunately, shows little sign of breaking down in the near future.
6. Foreploy: Any misrepresentation about yourself for the purpose of having sex.
7. Giraffiti: Vandalism spray-painted very, very high
8. Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
9. Inoculatte: To take coffee intravenously when you are running late.
10. Osteopornosis: A degenerate disease. (This one got extra credit.) amen!!!
11. Karmageddon: It's like, when everybody is sending off all these really bad vibes, right? And then, like, the Earth explodes and it's like, a serious bummer.
12. Decafalon (n.): The grueling event of getting through the day consuming only things that are good for you.
13. Glibido: All talk and no action.
14. Dopeler Effect : The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.
15. Arachnoleptic Fit (n.): The frantic dance performed just after you've accidentally walked through a spider web.
16. Beelzebug (n.): Satan in the form of a mosquito, that gets into your bedroom at three in the morning and cannot be cast out.
17. Caterpallor ( n.): The color you turn after finding half a worm in the fruit you're eating.
18. Coffee, n. The person upon whom one coughs.
19. Flabbergasted, adj. Appalled by discovering how much weight one has gained.
20. Abdicate, v. To give up all hope of ever having a flat stomach.
21. esplanade, v. To attempt an explanation while drunk.
22. Willy-nilly, adj. Impotent.
23. Negligent, adj. Absentmindedly answering the door when wearing only a nightgown.
24. Lymph, v. To walk with a lisp.
25. Gargoyle, n. Olive-flavored mouthwash.
26. Flatulen, n. Emergency vehicle that picks up someone who has been run over by a steamroller.
27. Balderdash, n. A rapidly receding hairline.
28. Testicle, n. A humorous question on an exam.
29. Rectitude, n. The formal, dignified bearing adopted by proctologists.
30. Pokemon, n. A Rastafarian proctologist.
31. Oyster, n. A person who sprinkles his conversation with Yiddishisms.
32. Frisbeetarianism, n. The belief that, after death, the soul flies up onto the roof and gets stuck there.
33. Circumvent, n. An opening in the front of boxer shorts worn by Jewish men. (THE BIG WINNER)

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Comparison of USA vs. Russia and China for Hypersonic Missiles

 I asked Google Search AI to compare the current capabilities of the USA, Russia and China to make, deploy and use hypersonic missiles, including the availablem odels, the cost, and capability of each system.

Here's what Google AI told me on 23 July 2026 (I don't know how current this is, but one source is from 15 July 2026):

==================================

Russia currently leads the United States in the operational deployment and combat testing of hypersonic weapons, while competing closely with China, which boasts the world's most rapidly expanding and mass-produced hypersonic arsenal. [1, 2]
The global hypersonic race is defined by a clear dynamic: Russia and China have successfully fielded multiple operational systems, while the United States remains primarily in a development and testing phase. [1, 2]
1. Operational Status and Deployments
  • Russia: Russia maintains a diverse and combat-tested hypersonic portfolio. This includes the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle (mounted on ICBMs for strategic nuclear deterrence), the air-launched Kh-47M2 Kinzhal, and the ship-launched Zircon cruise missile. Most recently, Russia has integrated and mass-produced the Oreshnik, a nuclear-capable intermediate-range hypersonic missile deployed to borders like Belarus. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • China: China has successfully deployed robust regional hypersonic systems, notably the DF-17 medium-range ballistic missile equipped with the DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle. It has also introduced the YJ-21 anti-ship hypersonic missile to target naval assets, demonstrating rapid domestic manufacturing and deployment. [1, 2, 3]
  • United States: The U.S. does not yet have a fully fielded, mass-produced hypersonic weapon. It is actively testing platforms like the Army’s Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) and various air-launched cruise missile concepts through DARPA and branches of the military, but continues to play catch-up. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
2. Strategic Mission and Payload (Nuclear vs. Conventional)
  • Russia & China: Both nations heavily view hypersonics as primary tools for nuclear strategic deterrence and overcoming Western missile defense systems. Their missiles are explicitly designed to carry both nuclear and conventional payloads. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • United States: By contrast, the U.S. has strictly prioritized conventionally armed hypersonic weapons. Because a conventional warhead requires extreme technical precision to destroy a target without a nuclear blast radius, the U.S. development and engineering cycles face much tighter technical tolerances, slowing down deployment timelines. [1, 2, 3]
3. Combat Testing and Technological Heritage
  • Russia: Russia holds a distinct edge in combat utilization, having fired hundreds of hypersonic or near-hypersonic missiles during its ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This provides real-world data on performance against Western air defenses like the Patriot system. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • China: China leverages its vast manufacturing capability to scale production quickly. There is also growing strategic collaboration; experts note that China's newer systems utilize Russian missile design heritage while offering advanced software and mass-production speeds that Russia currently lacks. [1]
4. Cost and Production Scalability
  • United States: The U.S. faces severe infrastructure constraints and skyrocketing development costs. American hypersonic prototypes are estimated to cost between $15 million and $30 million per missile, making large-scale stockpiling financially unsustainable compared to cheaper drone and missile options. [1, 2]
  • Russia & China: Both nations have dedicated years of heavy, uninterrupted funding to these programs, allowing them to build mature supply chains that can absorb mass-production orders far more efficiently than Western defense contractors. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Would you like to focus on a specific aspect of this comparison? I can provide more details on:
The technical differences between hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs) and scramjet cruise missilesHow current U.S. air defense systems like the Patriot or Aegis perform against hypersonic threatsThe specific capabilities and range of Russia's new Oreshnik missile.